New Facebook Feature Encourages Spamming


AllFacebook.com
reported last night – and Trendline Interactive has confirmed – that Facebook has added a tool called “Contact Importer for Pages” that gives the ability for Facebook page admins to upload a file in “Outlook, Constant Contact, .CSV, etc..” format to send invitations to their “Fans” (isn’t that a Facebook term?) to “Like” them on Facebook.

What that really means, is that any Facebook Pages admin can upload any list of email addresses, 5000 at a time, and Facebook will do 1 of 2 things:

  • If Facebook has the email address attached to a profile, they user will receive suggestions for the Facebook Page on Facebook.com
  • If Facebook doesn’t have the address in it’s 500+ million user database, Facebook will send…you guessed it…an email invitation.

Yikes.

Watch it unfold as we tested it:

This Looks Like Trouble with a Capital T-R-O-U-B-L and E

Facebook didn’t just give the keys to new and budding page admins with a slick new tool, it just handed the keys over to every opportunist and spammer in the world. In our testing, keep in mind, Trendline has 18 total fans. There are no apparent limitations on who can use this functionality. Somewhere, a Nigerian prince is thankful that his job just got easier.

  1. Create a new free email account so you can never be tracked
  2. Create your Facebook account with the newly minted email address
  3. Set up a new Facebook Fan Page
  4. Upload any email list (they even encourage purchased lists!)
  5. Let Facebook do your spamming dirty work

In the past, spammers have had to get a lot more creative, but they have just been handed a gateway through which they can send unsolicited email under the protective umbrella of a reputable sender.

Of course, Facebook have their guidelines that Facebook Pages admins need to agree to before any emails are sent. Let’s take a look:

“Comply with all applicable laws.”

Apparently, the minds behind this new feature are too young to have learned from Sylvester who always promised to take real good care of Tweety.

“Satisfy yourself that your invites are welcome. For example, in some parts of the world, you must obtain opt-in consent before you can send emails promoting a product, service, commercial web page, or business.”

Clearly. If your invites aren’t welcome, there will be no satisfying yourself.

“Respect opt-out requests; take people off your lists if they don’t want to receive invites or other communications from you.”

We have a serious question on this one. How exactly do we know if they don’t want to receive our invites? Assuming I run a reputable business, I will send these invites to people I believe may be interested in “Liking” my Page. There is an opt-out included on the invitation email, but it says “If you no longer wish to receive messages through Facebook…” However, the message also says that “You are receiving this message from Trendline Interactive.” Is there a feedback loop in place so that I can take these off my normal mailing list?

“Don’t: Buy Mailing lists without verifying whether the list provider has obtained valid, affirmative consent where legally required.”

Wow. Speechless. It’s okay to buy lists and send them through Facebook so long as they are “opt-in lists.” I guess they could argue that BulkEmailBlast.com is not legitimate. Of course they would argue “All our Lists are 100% Opt-in, Targeted, and of the Highest Possible Quality.”

Why Facebook? Why?

The AllFacebook.com post announcing this new feature welcomes the addition. On the surface, this seems like a cool idea. Marketers continue to devise ways to get more of their email subscribers to become fans (and how to get our fans to become email subscribers). Communication with our consumers through both channels makes perfect sense.

But anyone who has been in the email space for more than a couple months should be able to see the writing on the wall. Our first reaction wasn’t “oh, cool” and then after thinking about it we started to wonder if their might be a potential hole. No, our first reaction was, “Are they nuts?”

1) People have multiple email addresses. Just because I sign up with my gmail account on one email subscription does not mean that is the same address I use for Facebook. Assuming the average consumer has about 4 email addresses, the chances the emails I upload as a marketer will be the same one my consumers use for Facebook is about 25% — possibly less. That means that 75% or more of my email subscribers will get an invitation to join Facebook at another email address. The spam implications on this basis alone are huge.

2) Marketers can already send an email to their customers asking them to become Fans—they have been doing so for a couple years already. Is this a win for the marketer, or a win for Facebook? Seems like an attempt to accelerate Facebook’s growth more than anything else.

3) Why would Facebook do something so risky when news outlets are already up in arms about privacy? Mashable tried to warn them about the security implications of Facebook Messages just 17 days ago — asking if they were opening doors for phishing scams and other malicious activity. According to Mashable, they are already the 4th most common target for these activities, this should propel Facebook to number 1 on that list overnight.

Advice to Marketers

Even for reputable marketers with a strong permission list and an active Facebook page, this is not the way to build your Fan base. There may be some advantages to having your invitation delivered through Facebook directly, but the risks are too high:

1) What are the implications of one of your subscribers opting out via the Facebook invitation? Are you supposed to honor that on your email list also?

2) What is the feedback mechanism from Facebook for people who don’t want to get your invitations? We can’t find one.

3) The relationships consumers maintain with brands through email and Facebook are different. Their motivations for engaging brands through email and Facebook are different. Just because they are a subscriber don’t assume they want to become a Fan. There is already a way to invite people on your email list to become a Fan. Send them an email and ask them. Overstepping their boundaries may result in little more than upsetting some loyal customers.

4) We’ll see how long this whole experiment lasts; it may get shut off quickly. Facebook may be facing it’s own deliverability problems as people start marking these invitations as spam. Let the dust settle and don’t get caught in the cross-hairs.

What are your thoughts on this?

This entry was posted in All Posts, Email Marketing, Social Media. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://trendlineinteractive.com Alex Williams

    Facebook and Page Owners win, consumers and inboxes lose.

    • http://twitter.com/mostew mostew

      And thanks to you Mr. Williams for noticing this last night. You get all the credit for recognizing this from the first moment. Glad we could collaborate on this!

      • http://twitter.com/bncees bridgingnations

        I tried this feature out for my fan page and it really worried me. I thought I was the only one who thought this would spam users, until i read this post…Nigerian scamsters really have an opportunity to rejoice!

  • http://twitter.com/ryanpphelan Ryan Phelan

    Well, I think we all suspected that there might be privacy challenges with Facebook at some point. It would seem that this is the first “salvo” in that challenge.

    • http://twitter.com/mostew mostew

      The surprising thing for me is how quickly this came out on the heals of the Message Platform announcement. They are sure jumping into the email space with all they’ve got, just seems there is a total lack of understanding about the history of email.

  • http://www.aweber.com/blog/ Justin Premick

    I agree re: the T-R-O-U-B-L-E points made here, but setting that aside for a minute and assuming the people reading this have existing permission-based email programs, here’s my question:

    If you’re a marketer who is already growing/managing your own email list, why use this tool?

    Surely it’s better to deliver such a “Like us on FB!” message through your ESP, as an email, where you can manage complaints, unsubscribes and feedback more reliably. Not to mention be more creative with your creative.

    FB’s tool makes it simple to send such an invite, sure… but I’m not sure that “it’s simple” is a reason to do it this way.

    • http://twitter.com/mostew mostew

      Exactly. Good marketers should understand that there is little advantage to doing it this way. It’s small business owners that appear to be targeted with “simplicity” offerings like this–many of whom, BTW, don’t understand the risks associated with purchasing lists either!

    • http://twitter.com/andrewbonar Andrew Bonar

      One reason to send it to your list in this way is it costs you nothing, another would be the message is delivered within the “FB channel”. Maybe it would result in a higher take up or better ROI.

      Never one to assume I like to test. You are right sending direct through your ESP has resulted in a much higher take up in my split test. 5000 sent an email with 7% + conversion, using Facebook less than 1% conversion.

      • http://www.aweber.com/blog/ Justin Premick

        Hey Andrew,

        Thanks for running the test!

        The costless nature of sending via FB will doubtless tempt some businesses into going that route rather than sending an email campaign, regardless of differences in conversion rates. Pity.

  • Pingback: Facebook Makes Life Easier for the Son of the King of Nigeria « The Storied Future

  • http://twitter.com/ryanrohypnol Ryan Rohypnol

    Facebook is the reason I have health insurance and food in my refrigerator…

  • http://twitter.com/remybergsma Remy Bergsma

    Argghh! Seriously what’s up with this? Does Facebook crew like spam or something? I’ll reroute this stuff to the Facebook peeps, let’s see how fast this function gets turned off..

  • http://twitter.com/andrewbonar Andrew Bonar

    It will not take long. I have had 3 request in relation this in 24 hours!

  • Stephanie Miller

    Wow – agree this was not well thought through, hopefully they will pull it back. I’ll be sending this thoughtful article to the postmasters at Facebook now. I can’t believe they would endorse this.

    Thanks for identifying it guys!

    Best,
    Stephanie
    @StephanieSAM

    • http://www.trendlineinteractive.com Morgan Stewart

      Thanks Stephanie! Please let me know if you get a response. Happy to help!

  • Pingback: ‘Spam King’ sent up to 10 billion messages a day | get cheap watches

  • Pingback: Viral Twitter Power » Blog Archive » The success? S strate? Marketing strategies Twitter E-Book

  • Pingback: Emailblog.eu » Blog Archive » With Facebook Messages new style comes email scams

  • http://twitter.com/andrewbonar Andrew Bonar

    I have run several tests and not seen any emails to the accounts not registered with Facebook. I could be wrong but I don’t think the message to non FB users goes out. I think its only the ones already on the FB network which get an invite. Could be wrong, but so far in my tests no emails… Has anyone seen an FB “invite email” sent to a standard email account?

    • http://twitter.com/getintheinbox Captain Inbox

      I really hope so! That mass invite thing has been the death of so many smaller social attempts. while Facebook may have enough klout to avoid certain consequences it will not do them any good! These sites are meant to be viral by sharing not list linking.

  • Pingback: C.E.T. Enzymatic Chews for Medium Dogs | PetNutritionProducts.com | CET CHEWS LARGE

  • Pingback: Dragon Age Origins – An RPG Without the Average "Grind" » Dragon Age Origins

  • Pingback: Xbox Games Review – Splinter Cell Conviction » Splinter Cell Conviction